10018783-11200MLF
vs
10018783-01430M
feature comparison
| Rohs Code |
Yes
|
|
| Part Life Cycle Code |
Active
|
Active
|
| Ihs Manufacturer |
AMPHENOL ICC
|
FCI
|
| Package Description |
ROHS COMPLIANT
|
|
| Pin Count |
36 (x1)
|
|
| Reach Compliance Code |
compliant
|
unknown
|
| ECCN Code |
EAR99
|
EAR99
|
| HTS Code |
8536.69.40.40
|
8536.69.40.40
|
| Board Mounting Option |
SPLIT BOARD LOCK
|
|
| Body Breadth |
0.346 inch
|
|
| Body Depth |
0.443 inch
|
|
| Body Length |
0.984 inch
|
|
| Connector Type |
CARD EDGE CONNECTOR
|
CARD EDGE CONNECTOR
|
| Contact Finish Mating |
NOT SPECIFIED
|
|
| Contact Finish Termination |
TIN OVER NICKEL
|
|
| Contact Gender |
FEMALE
|
|
| Contact Material |
NOT SPECIFIED
|
|
| Contact Pattern |
RECTANGULAR
|
|
| Contact Resistance |
30 mΩ
|
|
| Contact Style |
BELLOWED TYPE
|
|
| DIN Conformance |
NO
|
|
| Dielectric Withstanding Voltage |
400VAC V
|
|
| Durability |
50 Cycles
|
|
| Filter Feature |
NO
|
|
| IEC Conformance |
NO
|
|
| Insertion Force-Max |
1.15 N
|
|
| Insulation Resistance |
1000000000 Ω
|
|
| Insulator Color |
BLACK
|
|
| Insulator Material |
GLASS FILLED POLYAMIDE
|
|
| JESD-609 Code |
e3
|
|
| MIL Conformance |
NO
|
|
| Mating Contact Pitch |
0.039 inch
|
|
| Mixed Contacts |
NO
|
|
| Mounting Option 1 |
LOCKING
|
|
| Mounting Style |
STRAIGHT
|
|
| Mounting Type |
BOARD
|
|
| Number Of Connectors |
ONE
|
|
| Number Of PCB Rows |
4
|
|
| Number of Rows Loaded |
2
|
|
| Operating Temperature-Max |
85 °C
|
|
| Operating Temperature-Min |
-55 °C
|
|
| Option |
GENERAL PURPOSE
|
|
| PCB Contact Pattern |
STAGGERED
|
|
| PCB Contact Row Spacing |
2 mm
|
|
| Plating Thickness |
FLASH inch
|
|
| Rated Current (Signal) |
1.1 A
|
|
| Reference Standard |
UL
|
|
| Terminal Length |
0.091 inch
|
|
| Terminal Pitch |
2 mm
|
|
| Termination Type |
SOLDER
|
|
| Total Number of Contacts |
36
|
|
| UL Flammability Code |
94V-0
|
|
| Withdrawl Force-Min |
0.15 N
|
|
| Base Number Matches |
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
Compare 10018783-11200MLF with alternatives
Compare 10018783-01430M with alternatives