55500-102LF
vs
56132-G16-20-0500
feature comparison
| Rohs Code |
Yes
|
No
|
| Part Life Cycle Code |
Active
|
Active
|
| Ihs Manufacturer |
AMPHENOL ICC
|
AMPHENOL ICC
|
| Package Description |
LEAD FREE
|
|
| Reach Compliance Code |
compliant
|
compliant
|
| ECCN Code |
EAR99
|
EAR99
|
| HTS Code |
8536.69.40.40
|
8536.69.40.40
|
| Additional Feature |
POLARIZED
|
|
| Body Breadth |
0.157 inch
|
0.19 inch
|
| Body Depth |
0.244 inch
|
0.5 inch
|
| Body Length |
1.575 inch
|
2 inch
|
| Connector Type |
BOARD STACKING CONNECTOR
|
BOARD STACKING CONNECTOR
|
| Contact Finish Mating |
NOT SPECIFIED
|
GOLD (30) OVER NICKEL (50)
|
| Contact Gender |
MALE
|
MALE
|
| Contact Material |
NOT SPECIFIED
|
PHOSPHOR BRONZE
|
| Contact Pattern |
RECTANGULAR
|
RECTANGULAR
|
| Contact Style |
SQ PIN-SKT
|
SQ PIN-SKT
|
| DIN Conformance |
NO
|
NO
|
| Filter Feature |
NO
|
NO
|
| IEC Conformance |
NO
|
NO
|
| Insulator Color |
BLACK
|
BLACK
|
| Insulator Material |
GLASS FILLED POLYAMIDE
|
POLYETHYLENE
|
| JESD-609 Code |
e3
|
e0
|
| MIL Conformance |
NO
|
NO
|
| Mating Contact Pitch |
0.079 inch
|
0.1 inch
|
| Mating Contact Row Spacing |
0.079 inch
|
0.1 inch
|
| Mixed Contacts |
NO
|
NO
|
| Mounting Option 1 |
LOCKING
|
|
| Mounting Style |
STRAIGHT
|
STRAIGHT
|
| Mounting Type |
BOARD
|
BOARD
|
| Number Of Connectors |
ONE
|
ONE
|
| Number Of PCB Rows |
2
|
2
|
| Number of Rows Loaded |
2
|
2
|
| Option |
GENERAL PURPOSE
|
GENERAL PURPOSE
|
| PCB Contact Pattern |
RECTANGULAR
|
RECTANGULAR
|
| PCB Contact Row Spacing |
2.0066 mm
|
2.54 mm
|
| Plating Thickness |
30u inch
|
30u inch
|
| Reference Standard |
UL
|
UL
|
| Terminal Length |
0.142 inch
|
0.33 inch
|
| Terminal Pitch |
2 mm
|
2.54 mm
|
| Termination Type |
SOLDER
|
SOLDER
|
| Total Number of Contacts |
40
|
40
|
| UL Flammability Code |
94V-0
|
94V-0
|
| Base Number Matches |
1
|
2
|
| Body/Shell Style |
|
RECEPTACLE
|
| Contact Finish Termination |
|
Tin/Lead (Sn/Pb) - with Nickel (Ni) barrier
|
|
|
|
Compare 55500-102LF with alternatives
Compare 56132-G16-20-0500 with alternatives